“A good many times I have been present at gatherings of people who, by the standards of the traditional culture, are thought highly educated and who have with considerable gusto been expressing their incredulity at the illiteracy of scientists. Once or twice, I have been provoked and have asked the company how many of them could describe the second law of thermodynamics. The response was cold: it was also negative. Yet, I was asking something which is about the scientific equivalent of: Have you read a work of Shakespeare's?”— Charles Snow (1959), “The Two Cultures”, Rede Lecture, Cambridge, May 7
“The age of Faust [1772-1882] had been the age of the ‘Renaissance man’, a time when the possibility of a universal knowledge, mastery of the arts and sciences, still seemed to be open to the ambitious mind; [thereafter] the separation and dispersion of intellectual endeavors, dubbed the ‘two cultures’ by C.P. Snow, [resulted]; [in the years to follow, individuals such as] Thomas Young, Humphry Davy, and William Hamilton, could all make serious claims to humanistic breadth, if not universality, in their intellectual accomplishments; nevertheless, a rift between the arts and the sciences was evident.”
“Luddites and anti-intellectuals do not master the [partial] differential equations of thermodynamics or the biochemical cures of illness; they stay in thatched huts and die young.”— Edward Wilson (1978), On Human Nature (pg. 207); presumably a play on Snow’s lecture
“I believe that intellectual life of the whole of western society is increasingly being split into two polar groups: ‘literary intellectuals’ at one pole, at the other ‘scientists’, as the most representative, the physical scientists. Between the two, a gulf of mutual incomprehensibility, sometimes, particularly among the young, a hostility and dislike, but most all a lack of understanding.”— Charles Snow (1959), “The Two Cultures”, Rede Lecture, Cambridge, May 7