“Biology was reconstructed on thermodynamic grounds in the 1920s through the work of A.G. Tansley, Edgar Transeau, Max Kleiber, and others who began conceiving of organisms as energy fixers or consumers and of natural systems as complex webs of energy flows and transformations, thereby developing the modern science of ecology. Alfred Lotka and Howard Odum extended the approach, pointing to the role that energy appropriation plays in evolution: individuals and species that have the largest net energy surplus can dedicated more of their life energy to reproduction, outcompeting their rivals.”
“I began collecting references to the second law, and eventually my idle curiosity became an academically enforced obsession as I made the social history of the second law the topic of my doctoral dissertation.”
“The second law of thermodynamics is one of the bedrock truths that physics offers to the world.”— Eric Zencey (1983), “Entropy as Root Metaphor” [2]
“Mechanism, which counts among its progenitors and partisans Democritus, Descartes, Hobbes, Locke, Berkeley, and Hume, has at its root the engineer’s model or machine, with its atomistic and manipulatable parts.”— Eric Zencey (1983), “Entropy as Root Metaphor” [2]
Zancey in a 2011 interview talking about how he wrote an op-ed piece on Frederick Soddy's economic theories (see: adjacent 1983 quote on Soddy) for the New York Times. | Zancey giving his “Energy as Master Resource” talk at Fourth Annual Biophysical Economics Conference, University of Vermont in Burlington, Vermont, Oct 26, wherein he opens to Sadi Carnot and the second law. [4] |
“Frederick Soddy’s experience in the 1920s and 1930s offers a clear example of Kuhn’s dicta on the reception afforded those who are untutored in the prevailing paradigm; a Nobel laureate in chemistry, he was dismissed as a crank for his economic writings, because he presumed to take thermodynamics seriously and to argue that the practice of charging compound interest was an attempt to violate the second law.”— Eric Zencey (1983), “Entropy as Root Metaphor” [2]
“It is unlikely that the generating substance hypothesis – energy or entropy discoverable in human social relations and groupings – will achieve any great precision in its application to psychological or social and political affairs in its entropist formulation. This has to do with the shortcomings of the terms and categories of entropism as they are applied in these realms: the term ‘entropy’ is used metaphorically when it is applied to any form of energy that cannot be denominated in calories, and there are insurmountable difficulties involved in discovering a quantifiable, determinate, caloric content for such terms as ‘psychic energy’, ‘cultural energy’ or the energy of a community, an institution, or an idea.”— Eric Zencey (1983), “Entropy as Root Metaphor” [2]
A flyer for Zencey’s recent 2014 talk on “Ostwald, Energy, and Ecological Economics” at Illinois State University (see also: Thomas Wallace), interestingly sponsored by the department of chemistry, the Wilhelm Ostwald social energetics parts based on his 2013 chapter “Energy as a Master Resource”. [3] |