Left: Blum's 1951 Time's Arrow and Evolution. [1] Left: an older photo of Blum; as compared to hisyounger photo (above). [5] |
“An ability to metabolize, involving some system of catalysts is another fundamental property which cannot be conceived of except in conjunction with a mechanism for converting free energy, and we are deeply indebted to Blum and his Time’s Arrow and Evolution (1951) for his masterly analysis of this extremely important aspect of this subject.”— Sergius Morgulis (1952). “Introduction” to Alexander Oparin’s The Origin of Life [8]
“Practically since its first definitive formulation by Darwin the concept of chance variation and natural selection has dominated the study of evolution, although frequent attempts have been made to replace or modify it. Probably most such attempts are provoked by a vaguely defined awareness of an insufficiency in the natural selection hypothesis, and the recognition of a directive factor in evolutionary processes which persists through successive generations. The latter concept which is commonly known as ‘orthogenesis’, is supported a by considerable amount of evidence (Leo Berg, 1926), but at present is not widely accepted among biologists. The general reason for abandoning or neglecting this concept has been the failure, thus far, to demonstrate the existence of the necessary directing factor outside of the theological doctrine; and one may suspect that fear of leaning too closely to such doctrine has caused most biologists to ‘shy off’ from orthogenesis. It will be the aim of the writer to indicate the actual existence of a directing factor in evolutionary processes, while at the same time avoiding all necessity of invoking theological concepts.”— Harold Blum (1935), “A Consideration of Evolution from a Thermodynamic Viewpoint” [6]
A latter photo of Blum. |
“No matter how carefully we examine the energetics of living systems we find no evidence of defeat of thermodynamic principles.”— Harold Blum (1950), Time’s Arrow and Evolution (pg. 119) (Ѻ)