Title page to French social philosopher Maurice Hauriou's 1899 book Lessons on Social Movement. |
“I intend to seek analogies between social movement with physical movements, therefore, to compare the mechanics of social science with thermodynamics. I owe you some explanations on this design. There is need to establish a new science if analogies and relations that unite science are already established. In doing so, the human mind obeys the feeling that he has the web link and continuity of natural phenomena at the same time, if using the similarities found it is possible to determine more accurately the specific content of the new science and to classify the essential elements, then they serve it as it touchstone of human theories.”
“It became necessary to study the thermodynamics. Not being a mathematician, I feared this study, but my learning was greatly facilitated by the work of Henri Poincare which I wish to pay tribute to the uninitiated, that he is not only accessible, but bright. Taken together the principles of thermodynamics seemed to confirm my views rather than the reverse, but it might perhaps not suffice to mention that I was not sufficiently reassured, but when I understood the importance of the principle of increasing entropy I felt like a shocked. Here was the reason for the doubling of energy in the form of movement and heat, the key opposition of the organic and the representative, the increase in entropy was a sign that it exists in the “conduct” of the universe, conduct that is carried out by application of the organic representative and it is manifested by the creation of static and the increase of law, it aims to free items. I ventured to see in thermodynamics ‘the science of behavior of physical movements’ and I made for the moral sciences or sciences of the conduct of social movements.”
Pour concilier, par une théorie plus satisfaisante que celle de M. Fouillée ou de M. Bernés, les deux conceptious de la réalité sociale, —• celle qui la considère comme un produit du mécanisme, et celle qui y voit un produit de la liberté,— M. H. a cherché des analogies directrices dans la mécanique rationnelle et la thermodynamique. Il y a un mouvement social « comparable au mouvement physique » ayant comme lui son espace, sa direction, sa mesure (Leç. I). Il y a un « potentiel social », constitué par la situation, les richesses les inventions, les traditions, capable de se transformer eu vitesse acquise et inversement (Leç. II). Enfin, et surtout, de môme que les phéuomèues d'ordre thermique « représentent » les mouvements physiques, les mouvements sociaux ont leur représentation, scientifique ou idéaliste, mécauiste ou non mécauiste (Leç. III.). Par cette forme nouvelle de l'énergie, capable de se convertir eu mouvement et inversement (Leç. IV;, une solidarité nouvelle est constituée, qui est représentative et non plus seulement organique (Leç. V). Grâce à la réaction incessante de l'une sur l'autre, le mouvement social peut être « conduit », comme le prouve le principe de la dissipation de l'entropie, vers la création d'un « statique social, qui tend à concilier pratiquement le mécanisme et la liberté ». Nous ne saurions suivre dans le détail tant d'assimilations hardies. Elles ont d'ailleurs donné lieu, dans les articles cités, à un débat sufïïsant. D'une manière générale, il nous est impossible de trouver que les rapprochements invoqués éclairent les objets rapprochés. Sommes-nous instruits sur la nature du fluide électrique qui opère dans le téléphone si on nous dit qu'il est « représentatif », et qu'il roule les formules d'ondulation en ondulation (p. 60j ? Inversement, « que les alternances que l'on observe dans l'histoire des institutions sociales n'empêchent point les institutions de conserver la même individualité, le môme être, » cela s'explique-t il vraiment par la formule générale du principe de la conservation de l'énergie? Les métaphores orgauicistes ont longtemps égaré la sociologie : il ne semble pas qu'elle doive attendre beaucoup d'éclaircissements des métaphores rnécauistes. | To reconcile a more satisfactory theory than Fouillee or Mr. Bernes, both conceptious of social reality one that sees it as a product of the mechanism, and one that sees a product of freedom. Hauriou's guidelines sought analogies in rational mechanics and thermodynamics. There is a social movement "comparable to the physical movement" with him as its space, its direction, its measure (Leç. I). There is a "social potential", constituted by the situation, the riches inventions, traditions, was able to turn momentum and vice versa (Leç. II). Finally, and most importantly, the same order of thermal phenomenon 'represent' physical movements, social movements have their representation, scientific or idealistic or not mécauiste mécauiste (Leç. III.). Through this new form of energy that can be converted into motion and vice versa (Leç. IV, a new solidarity is formed, which is representative and not only Organic (Leç. V). With the reaction relentlessly one over the other, the social movement can be "led", as evidenced by the principle of dissipation of entropy, towards the creation of a "social static, which seeks to reconcile the almost mechanism and freedom". We cannot follow in detail so bold assimilations. They have also resulted in the articles cited in a debate sufïïsant. Generally, it is impossible to find that invoked comparisons illuminate near objects. Are we educated about the nature of the electric fluid which operates the phone if we are told it is "representative", and it rolls formulas ripple ripple (p. 60J? Conversely, " the vibrations that we observe in the history of social institutions do not prevent the institutions to retain the same individuality, the same being, "Does it really reflects the general formula of the principle of conservation energy? organistic metaphors have long lost sociology: it does not seem to await clarification of many metaphors rnécauistes. |