Various depictions of Muhammad, the apocryphal founder of Islam, the Arabian branch of Egyptian mythology. |
“Osiris-Aah, i.e. Osiris the moon god, appears in the form of a human-headed mummy, with a crescent-moon and full moon on his head. In his hands he holds symbols of stability, life, serenity, power and dominion.”— Wallis Budge (1911), Osiris and the Egyptian Resurrection, Volume One (pg. 59)
“Muhammad thought of Christian Trinity, not as ‘father’, ‘son’, and ‘spirit’, but as a triad of father Osiris, sun Horus, and mother Isis.”— Yoel Natan (2006), Moon-o-theism (pg. 608)
“Ancient Arabian folklore with its stone and astral cults, shamanism, various Judaic traditions, heretical sects within Christianity, and prevalent moon-god veneration, were all rolled together into a kind of salad religion, taking bits and pieces [from surrounding religions].”
See main: Muhammad never existedIn 1239, Frederick II published a treatise that denied the divinity of Jesus, Moses, and Muhammad, declaring each of them imposters, but conducted experiments to test the truths of various religious models, e.g. that Adam and Eve were the first two humans (language deprivation experiments) and soul detection experiments.
Above, a section from John Spark's histomap (1932), shows the rise and fall of "Arab power", from 450-850AD, during which time Islam was invented, similar to rise and fall of "Roman power", from 250BC-300AD, during which time Christianity was invented, which gives indication as to when the figure of Muhammad was invented (c.750AD), similar to the way the character of Jesus was invented (c.200AD). [5] All world powers, in short, arise out of some form of heated "action" to explode into the form that they become in history; the legare or "glue" of the why of the action, therein, becomes and afterthought, and named the "religion" of the movement, albeit done after the peak of the power. |
“That Muhammad could predict certain events does not prove that he was a prophet: he may have been able to guess successfully, but this does not mean that he had real knowledge of the future. And certainly the fact that he was able to recount events from the past does not prove that he was a prophet, because he could have read about those events in the Bible and, if he was illiterate, he could still have had the Old Testament read to him.”
— Abu al-Warraq (c.860) [1]
“Muhammad’s own presuppositions and systems show that religious traditions are not trustworthy. The Jews and Christians say that Jesus really died, but the Quran [Surah 4:157] contradicts them.”— Ibn al-Rawandi (c.870) (Ѻ)
“Frederick II, this pestilent king, a scorpion spitting out poison from the stinger of his tail, has notably and openly stated that—in his own words—the whole world has been fooled by three imposters, Jesus Christ, Moses, and Muhammad, two of whom died honorably, while Jesus himself died on the cross. Moreover, he has dared to affirm, or rather, he has fraudulently claimed, that all those who believe that a virgin could give birth to the god who created nature, and all the rest, were fools. And Fredrick has aggravated the heresy by this insane assertion, according to which no one can be born without having been conceived by the prior intercourse of a man and woman; he also claims that people ought to believe nothing that cannot be proven by the strength and reason of nature.”— Pope Gregory IX (1239), address to monarchs
“Muhammad probably never existed.”— Sven Kalish (2008) (Ѻ)
“It may sound crazy but it is not as crazy as it sounds: a number of scholars consequently suspect that Muhammad is not a historical figure, but a literary character that was created by ancient Arab storytellers, perhaps early in the eighth century of our era.”— Hans Jansen (2011), “The Historicity of Muhammad” [3]