 |
| Swedish chemist Torbern Bergman's 1775 listing of the symbols for phlogiston and the matter of heat, categorized as two types of "earths", of which he listed 15 types, as contrasted with the acids (25), alkalis (3), and metallic calces (16). [3] |
In
chemistry,
phlogiston, symbol ϕ (phi), was a hypothetical substance common to all combustible bodies and metals, which escaped during combustion or calcinations, but could be transferred to one
body to another, and restored to the metallic calces by heating with substances rich in phlogiston (charcoal, oil, etc.,). [1] Metal, for example, was produced by the following
reaction:

The theory phlogiston theory was conceived in 1703 by German chemist
Georg Stahl, modeled his teacher
Johann Becher’s 1669
terra pinguis.
Phlogiston theory was a precursor to French chemist
Antoine Lavoisier 1787
caloric theory; which in turn was a precursor to German physicist
Rudolf Clausius'
entropy theory.
OverviewOn a modification of Becher’s three earths theory,
terra pinguis was renamed as
phlogiston, from the Ancient Greek
phlogios for ‘fiery’, which was said to be the “
matter and
principle of
fire, and not fire itself” that escapes from burning bodies with a rapid whirling motion, and is contained in all combustible bodies and also in metals, which can be burnt to “calces”.
Calx is a residual substance, sometimes in the form of a fine powder, that is left when a metal or mineral combusts or is calcinated due to
heat. Calx, especially of a metal, is now properly defined as an ‘oxide’, i.e. a chemical compound containing an oxygen
atom and other elements. In the phlogiston theory, the calx was the true elemental substance, having lost its phlogiston in the
process of combustion. The phlogiston was said to have the property that it could be restored to the original substance by supplying a replacement phlogiston from any material containing it, such as oil, wax, charcoal, or soot, which was thought to be nearly pure phlogiston.
Phlogiston was thought of as a material entity, sometimes considered as the matter of fire, sometimes as a dry earthy substance (soot), sometimes as a fatty principle, such as in sulphur, oils, fats, and resins, and sometimes as invisible particles emitted by a burning candle; contained in animal, vegetable, and mineral bodies. It could be
transferred from one body to another. [2]
References1. Partington, J.R. (1937).
A Short History of Chemistry (The Phlogistic Period, pgs. 148-50). Dover.
2. Thims, Libb. (2007).
Human Chemistry (Volume Two) (phlogiston, pgs. 426-28), (
preview), (
Google books). Morrisville, NC: LuLu.
3. Bergman, Torbern. (1775).
A Dissertation on Elective Attractions. London: Frank Cass & Co.
Further reading ● Higgins, William. (1789).
A Comparative View of Phlogistic and Antiphlogistic Theories. J. Murray.
External links●
Phlogiston theory – Wikipedia.