Kinetic energyThis is a featured page

In science, kinetic energy is the quantity of work:

\tfrac{1}{2} mv^2

that must be done to bring a body of mass m, initially at rest, to a velocity v. [1]

History
In 1689, German mathematician Gottfried Leibniz had defined the following quantity, determined previously to be conserved in perfectly elastic collistions in 1669 by Dutch physicist Christiaan Huygens, as vis viva or living force:

Vis viva = m

In 1807, English physicist Thomas Young defined the above quantity as "energy":

E = m

In 1811, Italian mathematician Joseph Lagrange used calculus to show that a factor of two is involved in the relationship “potential” (potential energy) and “vis viva” (kinetic energy). [2] As defined via the symbols used by Lagrange, i.e. T as kinetic energy, in his 1788 Analytical Mechanics, kinetic energy was thus defined as:

T =\tfrac{1}{2} mv^2

where 2T denotes the whole "living force of the system". [3]

See also
Kinetic theory

References
1. Perrot, Pierre. (1998). A to Z of Thermodynamics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Rayner, John, N. (2000). Dynamic Climatology: Basis in Mathematical Physics, (pg. 94). Blackwell Publishing.
3. (a) Hamilton, W.R. (1834). “On a general method in dynamics by which the study of the motions of all free systems of attracting or repelling points is reduced to the search and differentiation of one central relation, or characteristic function.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, 124:247-308.
(b) Hamilton, W.R. (1835). “A second essay on a general method in dynamics.” Philos. Trans. R. Soc. London, 125:95-144.

EoHT symbol



Sadi-Carnot
Sadi-Carnot
Latest page update: made by Sadi-Carnot , May 27 2009, 2:24 AM EDT (about this update About This Update Sadi-Carnot Edited by Sadi-Carnot

53 words added
15 words deleted

view changes

- complete history)
More Info: links to this page
Started By Thread Subject Replies Last Post
SdogV Living Force of the system? 2 Apr 11 2009, 12:40 PM EDT by SdogV
Thread started: Apr 9 2009, 9:06 PM EDT  Watch
Libb:

So, you agree that panpsychism may be involved>?

My paper to be presented in part at the AAPT neeting at Glenbrook H.S. on Saturday, April 18, 2009 implies that all mass has a frequency of "living".
Do you find this valuable?    
Keyword tags: None (edit keyword tags)
Show Last Reply

Anonymous  (Get credit for your thread)


Showing 1 of 1 threads for this page