-
Test thread page
Sadi-Carnot 1 minute ago Test words Sadi-Carnot 1 minute ago Test words 2
Last updated:
Sep 20 2009, 12:05 PM EDT by
-
EoHT Wiki: Discussion and notice board
free to discuss any concerns or ideas below (with name and date) or use the thread section (at the bottom of the page): Difficulties with wetpaint
-
Eann Patterson
in Axially Threaded Connections , in 1985 at the University of Sheffield. [2] In 2004, Patterson was the head of the department of mechanical
Last updated:
Sep 29 2009, 12:40 PM EDT by
-
JHT: Cover
are welcome here, either in the threads below or as edited in comments.
Last updated:
Sep 18 2008, 6:41 AM EDT by
-
HT Wiki: FAQ
shown here, please feel free to leave your question below (either in the numbers following or threads at the bottom): FAQs: (1) Why all the ads
Last updated:
Apr 4 2008, 11:32 AM EDT by
-
Working papers
. The discussion threads on this page may thus be fortuitously used for critique, comment, and discussion of new papers. On the Supposed Attributes
Last updated:
May 25 2009, 11:11 PM EDT by
-
Debates
, online threads, response videos, or emails, etc. Whether or not a Maxwell's demon can exist is a sort of underground debate ongoing in thermodynamics
Last updated:
Sep 21 2009, 11:24 AM EDT by
-
EoHT wiki: Cover
the photo or in the bottom threads. Need to print the encyclopedia The general drive or force to print the encyclopedia results according
Last updated:
Apr 26 2009, 8:45 AM EDT by
-
EoHT wiki: Thermodynamics Medal (proposal)
significantly) Goethe thermodynamics medal or Goethe affinity medal Other naming suggestions are welcome (please comment in (a) the threads below, (b) add
Last updated:
Feb 5 2009, 5:03 PM EST by
-
Moriarty-Thims debate
." In debates , the Moriarty-Thims debate is September 02-19, 2009, 61-page discussion , originating via YouTube thread commentary in April
Last updated:
Sep 21 2009, 12:47 PM EDT by
-
EoHT wiki
threads. A significant contribution of new members is the simple act of adding new references (articles and books) to existing articles, which helps
Last updated:
Yesterday, 12:57 AM EDT by
-
 Error messsage (delete thread function)
Albums:
Uncategorized
Keyword tags:
None
Added:
Aug 18 2009, 1:45 AM EDT by
-
HT Wiki: Suggestions
the "threads" section below: Suggestions: 1. 2.
Last updated:
Feb 27 2008, 8:04 AM EST by
-
EoHT Wiki: Progress report
= $20/mo, paid by S.C. ). 03/12 - at 135 articles, 11 members; new domain name: eoht.info (see: thread notice); added "encyclopedia" to banner
Last updated:
Wednesday, 1:23 AM EDT by
-
IQBAL SALEH ABBA
I have grouped your previous posts into this one thread:
Post 1: the person who lists Iqbal Saleh Abba as a fake or scam is an ignoramus and a racist pig! Do the research and you will find him to be as real as Smith, Jones or Bush. Just do the research you moron...
Post 2: “Indeed, Iqbal Saleh is a real person alive young and continues to live. Guinness Book's office in USA must surely have his address, his birth certificate etc. Bravo
Thank-you for calling me “an ignoramus and a racist pig and a moron (IQ=60).” As for me “doing the research you moron”, I have been working on, doing research, ordering rare books, buying rare articles, reading obscure newspaper clippings, collecting citations of high IQ people in a home folder since before 2007. You can see the original 03/25/08 article here:
http://www.eoht.info/page/IQ%3A+200%2B/revision/2
which I posted online after I noted the commonality of both Goethe and Sidis being in the 210+ range and both having human thermodynamic theories. I am quite sure this is the most researched 200+ range IQ article on the Internet.
As I find people, I add them to the page, come (such as Iqbal Saleh Abba) going in the tentative or possibly fictional or joke section, until I have time to find more corroborative references. I only recently found this “Iqbal Saleh Abba” a few weeks ago. The main discussion on him seems to come from these 2005 treads:
http://utterlyboring.com/archives/2003/02/03/man_doubts_his_worlds_smartest_person_title.php
Since you seem to be a fan of this person, why don't you tell us a bit about who he is, particularly some of his intellectual feats?
Posted:
Mar 7 2010, 9:37 AM EST by
-
Why I'm not a molecule
When you mention these terms (god and soul) you admit adherence to the 6,000-year old Egyptian Ra (sun god) based theory of life, death, and afterlife (which dominates the minds of 72 percent of the world):
When I simply *mention* these terms I do what? I'm sorry, but your logic escapes me.
PS. This isn't a site or thread for comparative religions, but Carl Jung might say that Amenhotep IV was just a particularly spiritual fellow. (Brahman came from the North, with the Vedas.) The Hebrew God is unique in being totally abstract and transcendental, having no symbols (like the sun disk) or avatars. I won't discuss this further.
Posted:
Aug 25 2009, 5:37 PM EDT by
-
Entropy in 20th Century Chemistry Texts
Bruce, also regarding your suggestion that my 824-page textbook, Human Chemistry (which you have never read), is filled with baseless secondary verbalizations, I would suggest to you to either put up or shut up.
If you think you can explain the chemistry or thermodynamics of human existence better than I have done, thus far, then let’s hear it? You type up your stellar theory (article, book, or textbook), and we’ll publish it the Journal of Human Thermodynamics (or whatever journal or book publisher you want), I’ll read it and critique it, and then we can all debate your excellent views (which you seem to claim are better then mine), in the threads?
To cite an example, Indian chemist Surya Pati:
http://www.eoht.info/page/Surya+Pati
is currently finishing his upcoming article for the Journal of Human Thermodynamics on the application of human thermodynamics (and human chemistry) in understanding management problems in business organizations, theories which he plans to use in his future work in business management. As we see, some of us, instead of trash talking on the sidelines, are actually getting into the game, and working on this difficult topic, for the betterment of humankind.
Posted:
Sep 22 2009, 2:12 AM EDT by
-
Mislav Predavec
The irony is that you already agreed with one of arguments already on the lack of Mathematicians and physicists in their lists. Furthermore the issue isn't so much who is on the list as it is assigning specific IQ # to people like Goethe or Shakespeare. Now are you claiming thats not a clear argument to mention thats its absurd to draw specific IQ claims simply based on looking at someone's past works? If so that would imply that you think specific IQ # can be derived simply by looking at someone historical works. Is this what you think? Now as far making a list of 100 intelligent of all time, HMMMMM I guess you forgot post #6 in the "I think some of the names listed should be purged" thread(as you would see I never claimed to know who would be #1 since to that would be way to subjective and difficult). Therefore the burden of proof for someone making such a list should be on someone either attempting to make such a list or someone mindlessly recycling their work rather than someone who never claimed to know who would be #1. Now are you going to so inane as to claim that before someone can point out how this list is flawed that I or someone else must make a comparable list? Furthermore I think you need to take your own advice? You say "without an clear backing to your arguments.". Well thats funny. Lets see I recall you using my exact links on Chris Langan I ironically posted to correct your disinformation and ignorance regarding Chris Langan's(you even said "good post"). Same thing regarding Rick Rosner. Furthermore you continue to ignorantly list Sidis IQ in the 200, 250-300 even after giving you the exact context in which that # came from(multiple times I gave you the quote) and source yet you still use it. Same thing regarding Adragon De Mello still listing 400.
Posted:
Mar 12 2010, 1:22 PM EST by Anonymous
-
Shannon Entropy and Thermodynamic Love - my thoughts
It appears I might have some time over the winter to write out a quick scientific summary of my data and conclusions - I have all the material I need to teach my classes next semester so I have some free time on my hands. I cannot assure you that the results are reproducible but I have very convincing evidence to suggest that it is. You may be, and rightfully so, skeptical of my theories presented in the above thread. But I can assure you the weight of the burden is upon me, and is gladly shouldered. I am certain you can relate to what I am taking about. I will do so under a pseudonym, of course :) Should I make this submission to you personally?
Keyword tags:
None
Posted:
Dec 20 2009, 10:35 PM EST by Anonymous
-
Human chemistry
shows the basic double elective affinity reaction threading the chapters of the book together (see: history ). Goethe's affinities See
Last updated:
Monday, 11:34 AM EDT by
|
|
