Already a member?
Sign in
Location: Discussion Forum
Discussion: "KISS" Physics Comments?
Watch
 SdogV |
"KISS" Physics Comments?
Feb 29 2008, 4:02 PM EST Preliminary draft for AAPT Meeting, Harper College, 3/15/08 "KISS" PHYSICS by Ted Erikson, R/E Unltd. (Research/Education) 1226 E. Madison Park, Chicago, 16, IL ABSTRACT: The motivation for this paper evolves from the last 6 words in Roger Penrose’s ROAD TO REALITY, namely, " –something that we all have missed…..". Several hundred viewpoints, (of thousands available from google searches,) were screened. Time, mass, and gravity are prominent subjects; e.g., a NATO report (1) involving some 50 abstracts, a journal report on origin of mass (2), and gravity (3), respectively. Without time there is no mass. Without mass there is no light. A "kiss" approach (trial and error) used dimensional analysis to derive a different slant on Physics. In short, from a given position, a mass travels from "here" to "there" while lighta is conceived to move such that it encompasses "area", not distance. The formulas for Planck constant, light velocity and gravityb are interpreted such that their meanings suggest mass has a will to increase its size for a longer time c of existence. Extremely short time primeval states appear below the Planck size while Biology correlates over 21 orders of magnitude (bacteria to whales) above. ________________________________________________________________ (1) Time: Geometry, Physics, and Perception, May 21-4 (2002) http://www.chronos.msu.ru/EREPORTS/arw_slovak.html (2)http://www.americanscientist.org/template/AssetDetail/assetid/14770/page/4 (3)) http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0301003 (Others pending) Tentative relations (a) So that c= ~108 meter2 /second2 considered as meter2 /second/second (b) Fg = G (M m r)/ r 3 (i.e., same except cubic meters in G makes sense. (c). t e =~ (M r 2 )/ h (i.e."existence" is about 10 –23 seconds for hydrogen nucleus.. _ Do you find this valuable? |
|
SdogV |
RE: "KISS" Physics Comments?
Mar 2 2008, 1:41 PM EST Just to clarify, mass proceeds via a line whiile photons spread radially onto thue surface of a sphere, hence c^2 makes sense as an area acceleration rather than a distance acceleration. Also,now I am confused because Planck constant times frequency is energy, so what is mass times frequency? The same as mass divided by time? Uh Uh. Do you find this valuable? |
