In 1676, Papin, as described in
Robert Boyle's
A Second Continuation, made a double barrel air pump, which had "self-acting valves" (
Shapin, 1985), as shown below, that were operated by turning a wheel, the use of two barrels employed so that the time to achieve a vacuum was reduced: [17]
In 1676 to 1679, Papin assisted Boyle in
air pump experiments. It was during this period that Papin invented his digester, or apparatus for boiling food under pressure; this invention was presented to the Royal Society on 22 May 1679 and published formerly in 1680 as “A New Digester or Engine for Softening Bones”, and in 1682, some of the Royal Society's dinners were being cooked in Papin's digestor. [11]
In Jul to Dec 1679, Papin was employed at the Royal Society by
Robert Hooke as an amanuensis. [11]
In Oct 1675, Hooke, we will note, in his
A Description of Helioscopes and some other Instruments, presented his future invention he intended to publish or make, invention number nine of which was a “New Invention in Mechanics of Prodigious Use, Exceeding the Chimera’s of Perpetual Motions for Several Uses”, the secret of which, when decoded by Hooke out of his Latin
anagram, was: "
Pondere premit aer vacuum quod ab igne relictum est" which translates as: “the
vacuum left by
fire lifts a weight” (Inwood, 2003). [13]
“Hooke’s ‘pondere [weight] premit [exerts] aer [air] vacuum [vacuum] quod ab igne [from] relictum [left] est [it is]’ is one of the principles upon which Savery's late invented engine for raising water is founded.”
— Richard Waller (1705), The Posthumous Works of Robert Hooke (pg. xxi)
“This [Hooke engine principle], which was restated by Jean de Hautefeuille [1678] and Huygens [1678] in the late 1670s, was regarded by some of Hooke’s admirers as the principle behind the invention of the steam pump by Thomas Savery in the 1690s.”
— Stephen Inwood (2002), The Main Who Knew Too Much (pg. 211)
It is difficult to see exactly what type of engine Hooke had in mind here, but it could have been a
gunpowder engine, or
combustion engine, a
Papin engine (1690), or possibly a
Hero engine of some sort?
In 1680, Papin was a “doctor of physic” and professor of mathematics at Marburg, Germany. [5] In 1680, he was admitted, on Boyle's nomination, to the Royal Society. [4]
In 1684, Papin was back in London, after three years in Venice, and was employed as a temporary curator of the Royal Society tasked with providing weekly experiments for the society. [13]
In 1661 or 1662, Papin entered upon the study of medicine at the university of Angers, where he graduated in 1669.
Quotes | OnThe following are quotes on Papin:
“I had cause enough to trust Papin’s skill and diligence. I asked him to set down in writing all the experiments and the phenomena arising therefrom, as if they had been made and observed by his own skill. But I, myself, was always present at the making of the chief experiments, and also at some of those of an inferior sort, to observe whether all things were done according to my mind. Some few of these inferences owe themselves more to my assistant than to me.”
— Robert Boyle (c.1685), Publication [19]
“A method of draining mines where you have not the convenience of a near river to play the aforesaid engine (with air-pumps and cylinders connected by an air pipe); where, having touched upon the inconveniency of making a vacuum in the cylinder for this purpose with gunpowder (according to his first scheme of 1687) he proposes the alternately turning a small surface of water into vapor, by fire applied to the bottom of the cylinder that contains it, which vapor forces up the plug in the cylinder to a considerable height, and which (as the vapor condenses as the water cools when taken from the fire) descends again by the air's pressure, and is applied to raise the water out of the mine.”
— Anon (1697), “Account of Papin’s steam engine”, Philosophical Transactions, No. 226, Vol 19, pg. 481; cited by John Farey (1827) in A Treatise on the Steam Engine (pg. 98) [14]
“Among the philosophers who applied themselves to the invention of machines to be actuated by the force of steam, the celebrated Denys Papin deserves most honorable mention; and his projects being all published, are more on record than those of his predecessors. Papin was born at Blois in France, and was educated as a physician. After obtaining a degree of doctor in medicine in his own country, and making some new experiments at Paris, he travelled into England, and taking an active part in the new philosophy, he was elected a fellow of the Royal Society in December, 1680. He passed some years in London, and assisted the celebrated Mr. Boyle in various experiments with the air-pump, of which an account is given in the History of the Royal Society, and in Mr. Boyle’s Continuation of New Experiments Physico-Mechanical (1682).”
— John Farey (1827) in A Treatise on the Steam Engine (pg. 93)
“The scientific fame of Denis Papin—not to speak of his connexon with our Royal Society, to which the French Academy may well owe a grudge on his account—lends an interest to any contribution to his biography. It is, however, with what are called mixed feelings that in Dr. E. Wintzer's close and conscientious study of the great physicist and mechanician's earlier experiences in the university of Marburg (Denis Papin's Erlebmisse in Marburg, 1688-1695, Marburg, N.G. Elwert'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, 1898) we find him not only beset by the ordinary misfires of petty university life, but involved in religious squabbles with the authorities of the congregation of Huguenot refugees of which he was a member. Out of these troubles ho found his way, partly by his own firmness and frankness, partly with the aid of the landgrave Charles, a prince whose intelligence is best proved by the fact that he contrived to retain in his service during something like twoscore years one of the most far-sighted scientific men of his age. Like Leibniz, the landgrave continued to trust the genius of Pepin oven after the failure (to be followed by success) of one of his inventions. No speculations can be ventured here as to how far either prince or professor could see into the future of the more important discovery with which Pepin occupied himself at Marburg in 1690, and which Newcomen was afterwards to transmit to Watt. Dr. Wintzer's essay throws some odd side-lights upon the penurious conditions of academical life in a little state whose ruler, intelligent as he was, indulged in a policy of his own, and maintained an army to match it. The revision of the system of French presbyterianism in Hesse-Cassel, consequent upon Papin's appeal to territorial authority, can hardly be treated as a subject of more than local interest ; but the references to the struggles of theological orthodoxy in the Hessian university against the advance of Cartesianism possess a wider significance for the intellectual history of the age.”
— A.W.W. (1898), “Book Review of Wintzer’s Papin's Erlebmisse in Marburg” (pgs. 609-10)
“About this time Huygens had as his assistant Denis Papin, a Frenchman who later worked with Boyle in England. With Papin, Huygens in 1673 experimented on gunpowder as a source of mechanical energy. There is a possibility that Huygens had considered some kind of atmospheric engine as early as 1660 when he talked with Pascal about the ‘force of water rarefied in cannons’. In these experiments of 1673, we can see the forerunner of Papin's atmospheric engine, which did in fact employ steam in place of gunpowder. Papin was later, through the interest of the Landgrave of Hesse, appointed professor at the university of Marbourg and it was here that he developed the atmospheric engine which gave Newcomen his clue. In exchange for Papin, as one might say, Oldenburg sent over to Huygens the wealthy young amateur Walter von Tschirnhaus, a friend of Spinoza and Leibnitz. He belonged to a class which had early supported the new scientific.”
— Arthur Bell (1947), Christiaan Huygens [18]
“Among further improvements in the [Huygens-improved Boyle] air-pump during the latter part of the seventeenth century were the two-way tap, introduced by Papin; and the double cylindered pump, probably introduced by Papin and perfected by Hauksbee, through whom the air-pump assumed what long remained its standard form.”
— Abraham Wolf (1959), A History of Science, Technology, and Philosophy, Volume One (pg. 107)
Quotes | ByThe following are quotes by Papin:
“We now raise water by the force of fire, in a more advantageous manner than that which I had published some years before; for, besides the suction, we now also use the pressure which water exerts upon other bodies, in dilating itself by heat, instead of which I before employed the suction only, the effects of which are much more limited.”
— Denis Papin (1698), “Letter to Gottfried Leibniz”; cited by John Farey (1827) in A Treatise on the Steam Engine (pg. 126) [14]
(b) Helden, Anne. (1991). “The Age of the Air-Pump” (
pdf) (Papin vacuum pump, pg. 164),
Tractrix: Yearbook for the History of Science, Medicine, Technology, and Mathematics, 3:149-72.
18. Bell, Arthur. (1947).