| |
| Left: A circa 1246 view of a spherical earth with people being affixed on all sides via the so-called 'gravitational force'. Right: Modern (2007) view of two human molecules (people) affixed to the earth molecule (earth), whereby attachments between molecules (human and earth) are defined as 'chemical bonds'. | |
“Gravity is not really a force but is a consequence of the curvature of space-time induced by masses. Space is curved around a massive body so small test particles moves in a curved orbit around the body, giving the illusion of a force acting on the particle.”
“Nobody, surely, in his sober senses, has ever pretended to understand the mechanism of gravitation.”
 |
| Cartoonish depiction of Danish physicist Erik Verlinde’s 2010 claim that gravity doesn’t exist, by NY Times artist Elwood Smith, but that gravity is a consequence of the thermodynamics. [6] |
“The product of the temperature and the change in entropy due to the displacement of matter is shown to be equal to the work done by the gravitational force.”
See main: Human chemistryIn the study of the nature of the force of attachments between larger structures, such as between humans, between humans and the earth, or between the earth and the sun, each structure is described via a “molecular formula”, namely: human molecule, earth molecule, sun molecule. In short, the human being is a large 26-element molecule, defined as a human molecule, and attachments of human molecules, such as between a man Mx and woman Fy: Mx≡Fy, can be clearly explained via extrapolations and use of standard chemical bonding methodologies. In a duplicate manner, the force that holds one human molecule to the earth (a 92-element molecule), E≡Mx , or the earth to the sun (a 72-element molecule), S≡E, should each find a similar explanation in culling theory from chemistry; namely in the study of the attachment of two hydrogen atoms, H≡H, out of which all mentioned larger structures are made. These molecular formulas are shown below.
In the study of the mechanisms and dynamic formations and attachments involved in human bonding, between two or more human molecules, the new view illuminated in investigations of the human chemical bond, modeled on the standard chemical bond, is that photon electron interactions, mediated by field particles, explains such attachments.
H≡H
Chemical bondHydrogen H
Mx≡Fy
Human chemical bondHuman molecule HE27 OE27 CE27 NE26 PE25 CaE25 KE24 NaE24 SE24 ClE24 MgE24 FeE23
FE23 ZnE22 SiE22 CuE21 BE21 CrE20 MnE20 NiE20 SeE20 SnE20 IE20 MoE19 CoE19 VE18
E≡E
Chemical gravitationEarth molecule
S≡S
Chemical gravitationSun molecule HE57HeE56OE54CE53NeE53NE53FeE52SiE53MgE52SE52
 |
| Einstein, his 1933 jottings on theories of love, and how he thought gravity cannot be held responsible for it. |
See main: Einstein on loveAmong the letters Einstein received in England was one from a man who had a theory that gravity meant that as the earth rotated people were sometimes upside down or horizontal. Perhaps, reasoned the man, this led people to do foolish things, like falling in love. This prompted Einstein to scribble the following response on the letter: [3]
“Falling in love is not the most stupid thing that people do … but gravitation cannot be held responsible for it.”
“No, this trick won’t work. The same trick does not work twice. How on earth are you ever going to explain in terms of chemistry and physics so important a biological phenomenon as first love?”
“The theory of gravity so exactly accounts for all the physical phenomena of the solar system, that it is impossible it should be false; and although we cannot determine its nature or its essence, it is as unreasonable to doubt its existence, as to doubt the existence of animate beings, because we know nothing of the principle of life.”— Horatio Robinson (1849), A Treatise on Astronomy [1]
