French thinker Jean Sales' illustration of “Newton in Senegal” (see: social Newton), from his satirical play “Reasonable Drama” (1777), showing Newton, depicted as a vegetarian, eavesdropping on a conversation between a merman, a meat-eater, and an oyster, which is desperately reasoning for its life, amid which a African, who believes in a scarab-like god, enters the scene, illustrating the idiosyncrasies and seeming moral conundrums involved in so-called morality of eating. [1] |
“From the benumbed oyster, to the thoughtful and active man; we see an uninterrupted progression, a perpetual chain of motion and combination, from which is produced beings.”— Baron d’Holbach (1770), The System of Nature (pg. 27)
“These reflections would appear to contradict the ideas of those, who are willing to conjecture that the other planets, like our own, are inhabited by beings resembling ourselves. But if the Laplander (Finnish) differs in so marked a manner from the Hottentot (Africans), what difference ought we not rationally to suppose between an inhabitant of our planet and one of Saturn or of Venus?”— Baron d’Holbach (1770), The System of Nature (pg. 45)
“In the eyes of nature, the oyster that vegetates at the bottom of the sea is as dear and perfect as the proud biped who devours it.”— Denis Diderot (1770), note to Baron d’Holbach’s The System of Nature (pg. 47)
“D’Holbach’s book caused a great stir among the Paris savants, effectively dividing the deists from the atheists. Voltaire, committed to deism and long impatient with d’Holbach’s declamatory ways, called it ‘a chaos, a great moral sickness, a work of darkness, a sin against nature, a system of folly and ignorance.’ He wrote to Delisle de Sales: “I think that nothing has debased our century more than this enormous stupidity.”— Rebecca Stott (2013), Darwin’s Ghosts: in Search of the First Evolutionists