A visual of the 1970 AAAS Symposium on Science and Human Values, with talks and commentary by: Ralph Burhoe, Aharon Katchalsky, Bruce Lindsay and Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi, focused on "human values in the context of thermodynamics". |
“Science provides only a car and a chauffeur for us. It cannot, as science, tell us where to drive.”— Clyde Kluckhohn (c.1958), “Scientific Study of Values and Contemporary Civilization”, told to American Philosophical Society; cited by Ralph Burhoe (pg. 82)
“Enthusiastic but poorly informed physical scientists have lately tried very hard to squeeze all of biology into the straight jacket of a reductionist physical-chemical explanation.”— Ernst Mayr (1969), "Scientific Explanation and Conceptual Framework"; comment on Hugo de Vries and the "Reception of Mutation Theory"; cited by Aharon Katchalsky (pg. 101); cited by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (pg. 163)
“For several decades, the search for adequate foundations on which a moral system could be constructed was directed toward the physical sciences. The assumption underlying these efforts was that the laws of physics represent the ‘foundations of nature’, and if—and what a huge if—human ethics should conform to natural requirements, then a set of weighty commandments could evolve from this study. Some of the better-known consequences of these considerations are the fine study of Bronowski [Science and Human Values, 1953] on the moral foundations of the whole structure of science and the famous attempt of Niels Bohr [Atomic Physics and Human Knowledge, 1958] to show that the principle of complementarity of atomic physics suffices for a new approach to human understanding and may serve as a basis for international complementary relations between contradictory cultures.”— Aharon Katchalsky (1970), “Thermodynamics of Flow and Biological Organization” (pg. 100)
“The prime position in the interpretation of human experience of the concept of energy, the most important idea in the whole of science. Representing in its simplest form the notion of constancy in the midst of change, it has come to pervade all aspects of life. There is nothing in our experience which cannot ultimately be described in terms of the transfer of energy from one place to another and for the transformation of energy from one form to another.”— Bruce Lindsay (1970), “The Larger Cybernetics” (pg. 127)
“Thermodynamics is the greatest physical theory ever concocted by the mind of man. There seems to be no reason to doubt that not only is the physical behavior of human beings describable in terms of energy, but that the same is true of mental and emotional behavior commonly ascribed to the nervous system.”— Bruce Lindsay (1970), “The Larger Cybernetics” (pg. 128)
“The second law conveys, to me, the distinct suggestion that we as individuals should endeavor to consume as much entropy as possible to increase the order in our environment. This is the thermodynamic imperative, possibly not unworthy to rank alongside the categorical imperative of Kant or even the golden rule.”— Bruce Lindsay (1970), “The Larger Cybernetics” (pg. 134)
“The Symposium on Science and Human Values at the 1970 meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science was largely devoted to the application of thermodynamics to social phenomena.”— Melvin Klegerman (1976), “The Thermodynamics of War” [1]